The Second Amendment Foundation filed a motion for preliminary injunction in Bathras v. Moore, challenging Maryland's Senate Bill 334 banning Glock handguns. SAF is joined by Atlantic Guns, the National Rifle Association, Firearms Policy Coalition, and two private citizens in arguing the ban is unconstitutional.
Firearms Policy Coalition (FPC), alongside the National Rifle Association of America and Second Amendment Foundation, filed a motion for preliminary injunction in Bathras v. Moore challenging Maryland's ban on semiautomatic handguns with cruciform trigger bars, which affects nearly all Glock and Glock-style pistols.
The federal government filed a motion to voluntarily dismiss its appeal in a case challenging the ban on firearms in U.S. Post Offices, making the Second Amendment Foundation's (SAF) win final. The Northern District of Texas ruled in September that the carry ban is unconstitutional, and the injunction now has nationwide effect protecting all current and future SAF members.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit ruled that New Jersey's bans on Modern Sporting Rifles and standard-capacity magazines violate the Second Amendment. NSSF Senior Vice President Lawrence G. Keane praised the decision, noting that MSRs are commonly used firearms protected under the Second Amendment, with over 32 million in circulation.
The Trump Department of Justice moved to voluntarily dismiss its appeal in FPC v. Blanche, allowing the Firearms Policy Coalition and Second Amendment Foundation's victory against the federal post office gun ban to stand. The permanent injunction protects all present and future members' right to carry firearms for self-defense in post offices.
The Second Amendment Foundation filed a motion for summary judgment in Harrington v. Crawford, challenging the unconstitutional search of high school student Jack Harrington's vehicle based solely on his legal firearm ownership. SAF Senior Director Bill Sack and founder Alan M. Gottlieb argue school officials violated constitutional rights without reasonable suspicion or evidence of unlawful conduct.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit struck down New Jersey's bans on semiautomatic rifles and magazines holding more than ten rounds, ruling they violate the Second Amendment. The NRA and Association of New Jersey Rifle & Pistol Clubs litigated the case since 2018, applying the text-and-history test from NYSRPA v. Bruen.
The Third Circuit Court of Appeals struck down New Jersey's assault weapon and magazine capacity bans, supporting the Second Amendment Foundation's two assault weapons ban cases before the Supreme Court: Viramontes v. Cook County and Grant v. Higgins. SAF Executive Director Adam Kraut and founder Alan M. Gottlieb expressed optimism that the ruling will bolster favorable outcomes in the upcoming Supreme Court term.
The Firearms Policy Coalition (FPC) achieved a landmark victory when the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit ruled that New Jersey's "assault firearm" ban on semi-automatic rifles violates the Second Amendment in Cheeseman v. New Jersey Attorney General Jennifer Davenport. The decision strengthens FPC's pending litigation challenging New Jersey's short-barreled rifle ban and follows the Supreme Court's agreement to hear FPC's Viramontes v. Cook County case challenging Illinois's similar ban.
Firearms Policy Coalition (FPC), the National Rifle Association of America, the Second Amendment Foundation, and the American Suppressor Association filed an amicus brief with the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals arguing that short-barreled rifles are protected by the Second Amendment and that the National Firearms Act's registration scheme lacks historical support under the Supreme Court's Bruen test.
The Second Amendment Foundation (SAF) filed supplemental briefs in three ongoing National Firearms Act cases, citing recent Supreme Court rulings in United States v. Hemani, Wolford v. Lopez, and Landor v. Louisiana Department of Corrections & Public Safety. SAF argues the NFA's remaining registration requirements lack constitutional authority following elimination of the $200 tax on suppressors and short-barreled firearms.
NSSF, The Firearm Industry Trade Association, expressed disappointment with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit's decision in Barnett v. Raoul, which reversed a lower court ruling that Illinois' law restricting Modern Sporting Rifles and standard-capacity magazines is unconstitutional. NSSF plans to file a cert petition with the U.S. Supreme Court, citing over 32 million MSRs in circulation and disagreeing with the court's characterization of these firearms as "dangerous and unusual."
Firearms Policy Coalition President Brandon Combs criticized the Seventh Circuit's reversal of a district court ruling that declared Illinois' Protect Illinois Communities Act bans unconstitutional. FPC notes the Supreme Court recently granted certiorari in their Viramontes v. Cook County case, which presents the same constitutional issues.
Firearms Policy Coalition (FPC) filed a petition for certiorari with the Supreme Court challenging New York City's ban on electronic arms like stun guns and tasers. The petition, supported by the Second Amendment Foundation and represented by Cooper & Kirk, PLLC, seeks to clarify that the Second Amendment protects all bearable arms and resolve confusion among lower courts regarding constitutional analysis of such bans.
The Second Amendment Foundation (SAF) and the Firearms Policy Coalition filed a petition for Supreme Court review in Calce v. City of New York, challenging New York City's ban on electronic arms. SAF Executive Director Adam Kraut and founder Alan M. Gottlieb argue the prohibition violates the Second Amendment and that residents should have access to non-lethal self-defense options.
Firearms Policy Coalition filed a motion to supplement its federal lawsuit challenging California's handgun roster by adding a claim against the state's ban on semiautomatic handguns with cruciform trigger bars, including most Glock pistols. The coalition, represented by Benbrook Law Group, PC, argues California's expanding handgun bans violate the Constitution and Supreme Court precedent.
The U.S. Supreme Court declined to hear a Second Amendment Foundation case, making SAF's Third Circuit victory final. The ruling affirmed that adults under 21 have the same Second Amendment rights as older adults, striking down Pennsylvania's carry restrictions during emergencies.
Firearms Policy Coalition (FPC) and Colorado State Shooting Association (CSSA) filed Elliott v. Denver, challenging Denver's assault weapon ban and magazine restrictions. The filing coincides with the U.S. Supreme Court granting review in FPC's Viramontes v. Cook County case challenging Illinois's assault weapons ban.
The NSSF celebrates the U.S. Supreme Court's decision to hear Viramontes v. Cook County and Grant v. Higgins, petitions challenging state bans on Modern Sporting Rifles. With over 32 million MSRs in circulation, NSSF argues these firearms are protected under the Second Amendment per Heller and Bruen precedents.
The U.S. Supreme Court granted review in Firearms Policy Coalition's Viramontes v. Cook County, Illinois lawsuit challenging Cook County's ban on semiautomatic rifles as unconstitutional under the Second Amendment. FPC stated this marks a significant step toward eliminating assault weapon bans nationwide.